شورت داخلي رجالي لركوب الدراجات الجبلية

Sizing is a bit weird. I went for a size larger than I normally have and that seems to fit ok. They are very comfortable though and have good padding. Cheap too, what’s not to love except the bonkers sizing.

I recently bought 2 pairs of these to replace my old MT500 undershorts that are excellent, especially for the cost, and fit extremely well, but worn out now after years of use. Likewise, I have an old and new pair of the MT900 undershorts - and it is the same issue with crazy tight legs.bottom sizing (cannot get them on) but waist stated way larger . As the issue on the latest MT500 and MT900 is the same, below I paste the issue from the MT900 as its the same. As others have said, the latest (2021) version of these are sized/cut for a stick insect. Dont buy without trying on in store. Likely uou will need to size 2 times up and take the waist in. Decathlon, PLEASE fix the weird 'large waist/ultra skinny legs' fit - its mad! I have a 32" Waist, and like the pair of these I got years ago bought Large, which used to be for 82-89cm and fitted well 32-34" with a slim athletic legs/hips. The latest version Large MT500 now state on the label they are for 98-104cm (38-41")!! However, despite the claimed size being way bigger than my waist, I could barely get these on my thighs/bottom, they are so tight around the thighs and bottom, my legs started throbbing! And I have a slim athletic shape legs/bum - not a 'Chris Hoy' figure. Friends keep telling my I need to eat more and put on weight, so its not my shape, but the new cut of the shorts. The waist might just at a push stretch to 41" - but there is no way anyone with that waist would get them above their knees. The shorts themselves (my last pair) are excellent especially for the price, brilliant - the pad is fabulous, comfy, light. Such a shame they have totally ruined the cut. I am going to have to try an XL (for my slim build & 32" waist!) in store and hope I can then take the waistband in - as they are otherwise great value undershorts. Maybe these were a mis-manufactured batch - however I also have the excellent MT900 undershorts - and also an old pair - and its exactly the same issue. You would need absolutely pipe cleaner legs, no bottom and a huge waist for the cut to have the correct snug but comfy fit.

Excellent produit